Social Credit Views

Monday, 11 November 2024 06:20

Social Credit and War

Written by
Rate this item
(1 Vote)

 

As today is Remembrance Day, I thought it would be appropriate for us to consider one of the implications of Social Credit theory with respect to war:

 "(...) the financial system (...) is, beyond all doubt, the main cause of international friction. Since, as we have seen, no nation can buy its own production, it is inevitable that there will be a struggle for markets in which to get rid of the surplus. The translation of this commercial struggle in a military context is simply a matter of time and opportunity. "[1]

 Social Crediters have repeatedly warned that there is a chronic economic cause, entirely artificial in nature and, therefore, unnecessary, which inexorably leads nations to take up arms against each other. Due to the underlying deficit in consumer purchasing power that afflicts all industrial societies operating under standard banking and accounting conventions, countries are frequently pressured to alleviate the lack of liquidity in the domestic economy by seeking to export more than they import. A so-called "favorable trade balance" (which is undoubtedly unfavorable in real terms because it implies a net loss of real wealth) helps an economy cover the gap between the prices of consumer goods and the consumer's income by getting rid of part of its surplus production at the same time that it simultaneously increases the flow of purchasing power to the consumer (through the jobs that are created and the profits that are obtained by the exporting companies). The problem is that it is mathematically impossible for all nations in the world to export more than they import; It is a zero-sum game. For every exporting champion, there must be a loser with a trade deficit. Countries that import more than they export are faced with a problem of a gap that has become even worse as a result of their commercial activities. Since every country is operating under the same internal deficit of purchasing power, the struggle for a favorable trade balance constitutes a struggle for survival. This leads, quite naturally, to economic conflict, or rather to economic warfare, in the form of commercial wars and "free trade”alliances, and, all too often, it can force or at least induce a military conflict. A country that does not manage to compete successfully through "innovation", hard work, or achieving lower prices than its rivals in the global struggle for an artificially scarce flow of purchasing power, can choose to ensure its victory through war, by defeating his economic opponents on the battlefield. The real reason for the war will, of course, be more or less hidden from the public and a pretext will be found, but the war may allow the aggressor to destroy part of his rival's productive capacity and / or, through the eventual signature of peace treaties, to insist on more favorable commercial conditions for himself (as part of due reparations).

The pressure placed on nations to compensate for their internal gaps between prices and incomes with favorable trade balances is intensified by the universally defended policy of full employment. If we insist madly, in direct opposition to the real physical potential of the modern industrial economy, that all (or almost all) must work in the formal economy in order to obtain purchasing power (or be supported by those who do), then we are demanding continued economic growth as an end in itself (as a means of distributing additional income as the population grows). The resulting production must find some outlet. If it can not be absorbed internally, a market must be secured for it abroad. It was for this reason that John Hargrave, leader of the Green Shirts (a paramilitary Social Credit group of the 1930s), courageously proclaimed on more than one occasion that "He who cries for full employment, cries for war".      Major Douglas explored in some detail the purely economic causes behind modern war in a BBC speech entitled "The Causes of War":


 

------- 

[1] C. H. Douglas, The Monopoly of Credit (Sudbury, England: Bloomfield Books, 1979), 92.

Last modified on Monday, 11 November 2024 06:25

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter all the required information, indicated by an asterisk (*). HTML code is not allowed.

Latest Articles

  • Social Credit and War
    Social Crediters have repeatedly warned that there is a chronic economic cause, entirely artificial in nature and, therefore, unnecessary, which inexorably leads nations to take up arms against each other.
    Written on Monday, 11 November 2024 06:20 Read more...
  • To Regulate or not to Regulate Retail Profit-Margins on Turnover? That is the Question!
    Recent events and discussions with both Douglas Social Crediters and others have brought the profit-regulation condition that was sometimes presented by Douglas as being part and parcel of the compensated price mechanism discount into focus. While some, following Douglas’ indications, have defended the profit-regulation mechanism as a necessary and/or important feature of the compensated price discount, others, including some seasoned Social Crediters, have objected to it as unnecessary and/or problematic for a variety of reasons. Rather than attempting to solve the problem or to resolve the dispute (which perhaps can only be properly decided definitively one way or the other by an empirical trial), I will aim to put the issue in context and to outline some of the main considerations both in favour and against the profit-regulation condition.
    Written on Saturday, 09 November 2024 08:23 Read more...
  • Quelques commentaires critiques concernant : «L’Île des Naufragés» – Autrement connue sous le nom de «L'Île du Salut »
    C’est en effet grâce aux efforts des Pèlerins que j’ai pris conscience pour la première fois du Crédit Social Douglas au début des années 2000 et « The Money Myth Exploded » a été l’un des premiers documents que j’ai lu. Pour leur zèle et leur dévouement, je leur serai éternellement reconnaissant, mais mes études plus approfondies de la doctrine du Crédit Social accomplies dans l'intervalle m'ont maintenant obligé à fournir les mises en garde suivantes. Quels que soient ses mérites, et ils sont nombreux, une lecture trop littérale ou hors contexte de « L’Île des Naufragés » peut conduire le lecteur à des conclusions erronées et sérieusement trompeuses. Il est donc nécessaire de les expliquer de manière assez détaillée afin que de tels écarts puissent être scrupuleusement évités.
    Written on Saturday, 19 October 2024 14:59 Read more...